| Hoosier United Methodist News |
June 2001 |
Reader's Viewpoints
What do YOU
think?
The Hoosier United Methodist News welcomes
all letters to the editor. In order to be considered for publication, letters
must be signed and should include the name of your local church along with a
daytime phone number for verification purposes. All letters may be subject to
editing for clarity or length. Deadline for each upcoming issue is the 15th of
the month.
Our wish is to provide a forum wherein all voices and points of view have an
equal opportunity to be heard.
Send to Editor, Hoosier UM News, 1100 W. 42nd St., Suite 210,
Indianapolis, IN. 46208; fax: 317.924.4859; e-mail:
editor
LBGT supporter does not represent 'us'
Ref.: letter, May edition , "A Solidarity Event on
Inclusion of Gays," Brother Dick Royal states he hopes he "represented us well"
at a celebration of solidarity in New Mexico. Attending, he reported, were
several from major religious organizations, and several from cults; i.e.
Unitarians, Christian Scientists, and wiccans (wiccans are not only a cult, but
are of the occult, witchcraft).
Mr. Royal spoke of the St. Bede's church support of
LBGT's [lesbians, bisexuals, gays, transsexuals]. Now, sir, we love and nurture
a people, race, color, creed, etc., but not all behaviors. Some behaviors such
as homosexuality, lesbianism, pedophia and necrophilia are, according to God's
Holy Word, sinful and to him an "abomination." (His word)! Do you read the same
Bible?
We love, nurture and pray for healing for people in
these sins, but cannot condone marriage or so-called same-sex unions for people
of the same gender, nor do we condone ordination into our Methodist faith for
the same. And we cannot condone such things as the scurrilous, unwarranted,
vicious attacks on the honorable organization of the Boy Scouts of America.
Homosexual "males" in charge, in precious positions of influence, guidance,
training and nurturing of our precious young men of future America? Not my boys,
grandboys, nephews or church youth, you don't! Don't attempt to represent "us,"
brother Royal. We are light-years apart in theology and belief!
Charlie K. and Pam Brown
Morton Memorial UMC, Clarksville
The demons within us in a climate of violence
Tim McVeigh is certainly not the person I would use
to argue against the imposition of the death penalty. He is not a minority and
has not been denied the best legal counsel in his defense. The worst terrorist
in American history evokes feelings of anger, hate, revenge and nausea within
me. These feelings are so intense at times that they actually frighten me. It is
then that I am able to recognize their source as being demonic rather than of
God.
For years as a child and young adult growing up
within the church I was taught to have faith "in" Jesus Christ to experience
salvation from sin and guilt and find wholeness and redemption. In later years I
have come to see that the faith "of" Jesus is equally important in my personal
spiritual maturation. It is far more difficult to acquire and particularly
vexing when applied to practices such as state-sanctioned capital punishment.
In Matthew 5: 38-42 Jesus specifically repudiates
the practice of "an eye for an eye … " In John 8 he stops the stoning of a woman
caught in adultery. These instances argue against capital punishment from a
Christian perspective.
Tim McVeigh bombed the Murrah federal building in
retaliation for violence enacted by our government at Ruby Ridge and Waco. What
further terrorist act may be committed in the future as revenge for McVeigh's
execution? Why plant the seed for further tragedy in the name of "justice" when
incarceration for life without parole can eliminate his elevation to martyrdom?
By acquiescing in the state-sanctioned execution of
Tim McVeigh, we demonstrate that we are motivated by the same delusional
thinking as he; i.e., the idea that a subsequent act of violence somehow atones
for a prior act of violence. Our difference from McVeigh is then underscored as
being only one of degree and not kind.
The Social Principles of the United Methodist Church
state our denominational opposition to capital punishment and our desire for its
elimination from all criminal codes. Our Book of Resolutions says "The United
Methodist Church cannot accept retribution or social vengeance as a reason for
taking human life. It violates our deepest belief in God as the Creator arid
Redeemer of humankind. . In the long run, the use of the death penalty by the
state will increase the acceptance of revenge in our society and will give
official sanction to a climate of violence."
Another of our resolutions states, "The death
penalty . denies Christ's power to transform and restore all human beings."
The only way violence will be stopped is if we break
the cycle. Fear of the death penalty did not deter McVeigh from committing his
atrocious act. Courage to have the nonviolent faith "of" Jesus will ensure that
violence is not glorified.
Joseph Smith, Pastor,
Kentland Trinity UMC
Chairperson,
NIC Board of Church and Society
McVeigh facing his own guilt vs. martyrdom
The Conference Board of Church and Society for the
South Indiana Conference opposes the execution of Timothy McVeigh that is set to
take place this month. The board protests this judgment for the following
reasons.
1. The Social Principles in the Book of Discipline
states:
"In the love of Christ, who came to save those who
are lost and vulnerable, we urge the creation of genuinely new systems for the
care and support of the victims of crime and for rehabilitation that will
restore, preserve and nurture the humanity of the imprisoned."
2. Timothy McVeigh does not want to face the
consequences and face his own guilt. If he did this he would have to admit his
action was morally wrong, which he does not want to admit. McVeigh should be
imprisoned for the rest of his life to be able to eventually face his guilt and
ask forgiveness.
3. Timothy McVeigh also wants to be made a martyr
for the "cause" through his execution. Making a terrorist a martyr sets the
stage for future Timothy McVeigh's to carry out similar terrorist activity not
only against the federal government but to take the lives of more people.
The Conference Board of Church Society, from a
morally, ethically and theologically grounding, support the argument for not
executing as opposed to carrying out capital punishment. Capital punishment in
this case is not a deterrent but may be argued as the catalyst for McVeigh's
dying as martyr for his cause.
Perry Richards, Pastor,
Alquina UMC, Connersville
Chairperson of the SIC
Board of Church and Society
Last updated on 01/14/2004
|