Site
Contents

Search

Contact Information

New Conference

Next Steps

Imagine Indiana Transition Team Information

General Information about the Area Office

Bishop Coyner's Office

Communications

North Indiana Conference Office

South Indiana Conference Office

Jobs & Events

Appointments

Appointment Process

Death Notices

Special Session

Annual 
Conference 200
8

General 
Conference 2008

Area United Methodist
Foundation

Conferences
& Districts

Links

Missions &
Ministries

Prayer Guides
(Courtesy of the NIC Prayer Team)


For resources to assist your congregation in welcoming guests, click here

Seashore District Volunteer Center VIM project -- Completed

Local Pastor's School

Course of Study

Site Map

Hoosier United Methodist  News Archives

Previous Years Annual Conference Coverage

News Releases

Home Page

Hoosier United Methodist News

May 2001

Balancing accountability and grace

Dear Ed & Susan:

I'm confused. Recently our pastor was discussing the death penalty, he reminded us of the United Methodist policy that we are totally against it. If someone has brutally killed someone else, why shouldn't they receive a similar punishment? I'm not an unkind or unforgiving person, but I feel so sad about what's happened to the victims, too.

Sad and Confused

Dear Sad and Confused:

One of the pleasures and difficulties of writing a column like this is that it causes us to examine our own beliefs. This is one of those questions.

The question at hand is how to balance accountability and grace. Of course, we have biblical precedent for both, "an eye for an eye" vs. "forgive your brother 70 times 7."

The first thing I want to affirm is your sensitivity to victim's and their survivor's plight. We join with you in the sadness and outrage for the loss of life and relationship, caused by recklessness.

There really is little way to find one's path to forgiveness without first grieving and secondly having accountability. In so many of these situations, we can do our grieving work, and we can hold the person accountable, but we don't see the perpetrator acknowledging accountability. That seems to "stick in our craw" regarding the sense of justice. The movie, Dead Man Walking, illustrates much of this dilemma. People were angry with the nun for walking with this man, as an extension of God's grace; yet, she held him accountable.

So, then, we are left to deal with our feelings about the other's lack of remorse. Do we "shake it out of them?" Do we demand it? Is this the only way we have to free ourselves from our pain? And, indeed, if we do that, does it even free us from our grief? As one person acts out of hatred, impulsiveness and probably their own personal injury; how can we ask ourselves to rise above similar pain and not inflict the same act? How is it possible, in the midst of our own grief, to value the life of someone who didn't do that for a brother or sister? How can we offer grace and forgiveness and give the final verdict to God?

The Methodist Church encourages each person to make his and her own decisions about these weighty matters. It is an awesome responsibility to think, feel and pray until we come to a not-very-easy conclusion.

Practically speaking, there is no statistical evidence that punishment acts as a deterrent to future perpetrated injury.

Thank you for your question,
Ed & Susan Alley

Both Ed and Susan Alley are Pastoral Counselors, licensed Marriage and Family Therapists and Clinical Members of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
Questions may be addressed to them, in confidence, and sent to: Kairos Center for the Family, 4337 Kessler Blvd. N. Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46228. Or  e-mail 
the Alleys.

Last updated January 14, 2004


Questions or comments: webmaster@inareaumc.org