The answer is simple --
love the sinner, denounce the sin. This age of blaming a predisposition from
their upbringing or a genetic trait, etc. denies the basis of who we are. We
are an accumulation of our life's choices. There are consequences for those
choices when they are not appropriate and righteous. Judgment from mankind
is not one of those consequences -- only God can
make that decision. However, I must be clear about
my beliefs and the Church must do the same. Waffling is not a choice.
Tom Coahran
Indianapolis
I read the Sunday paper this morning and learned
that the UM church had a trial near Seattle, Washington. I'm sure you know
the circumstances with regard to whether or not a openly gay person can
perform as an ordained minister in the UMC. First, I think it sad that a
trial even took place at all. Second, are all the church doctrines now
"negotiable", based on social norms? What does the UMC stand for now? Why
are churches so afraid of this issue? Why are we so politically oriented in
these days? Loving our brethren does not require we condone their personal
actions. Many (I'd say most) members of the UMC do not hate homosexuals, we
pray for them. Much the same we pray for alcoholics, drug users, pedophiles,
liars, cheaters ... etc. ... we all fall short. But we must demand a higher
standard from our church leaders, especially pastors.
I ask these: If a pastor in the UMC said he/she
was openly cheating on their spouse, and had no intention of changing
...
what would have been the outcome of that trial?
If a pastor in the UMC said he/she was openly
spending every evening at a bar getting drunk, and had no intention of
changing ... what would have been the outcome of that trial?
If a pastor in the UMC said he/she was openly
using illicit/illegal drugs, and had no intention of changing
...
what would have been the outcome of that trial?
If a pastor in the UMC said he/she was a
pedophile, and had no intention of changing ...
what would have been the outcome of that trial?
Pastors are not perfect, but should be striving
toward that end to set the Christ-like example. Once a pastor says they
don't have to strive to do the right thing in God's eyes, then why would
their church members seek to resolve their sinly ways? I wonder where all
this is leading us? Today, I am sad to be called a United Methodist. Today,
I pray for our church.
Randy Cox
Westfield, Ind.
I think the jury really made a mistake in their
ruling on Ms. Dammann, they have to answer to God not man! Is this where the
(United) Methodist Church is heading?
Claudia Hancock
Sullivan,
Ind.
Is it possible to read our Discipline section
304.3 "Since the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian
teaching, self-avowed practicing homosexuals are not to be accepted as
candidates, ordained as ministers or appointed to serve in the United
Methodist Church" and interpret that as not being a mandate? I realize that
this is a very delicate issue. However, thousands of Indiana United
Methodists are looking to you as their Bishop to speak out at least to us. I
am concerned that your silence may be misinterpreted as agreement. If you do
agree, at least tell us and let us deal with that, but if you do not agree,
sir, please let us know.
Roy Nevil
Poneto, Ind.
What this jury is saying is that the "UMC
Discipline" (man-made law) takes precedence over the Bible. Ten years ago we
were inching toward end times; today the world is daily taking giant steps
to Jesus' return. The UMC is facilitating those steps. I will be contacting
my local UMC to have mine and my husband's names removed from their rolls.
We have been receiving a paper subscription of HUM, please remove our names
from this subscription list immediately. Thank you.
Chris & Theresa Roush
Greenfield, Ind.
What a travesty when ordained clergy are allowed
to continue in ministry when they follow neither the law of the land, nor
the holy covenant to which they pledged, and also not the moral standards of
Scripture.
It is a shame and a sad day for America, the United Methodist Church
and all Christendom.
Ray Squibb
Sharpsville, Ind.
What have you all done? What is next? How can
you change the laws of God? Is the Bible no longer going to be our guide or
are you going to make up one to suit all sins? I won't sleep well tonight,
you have let me down, and my family and all the things I believe in. If you
send us a homo minister, we will close the doors. Perhaps we could make it
into a casino, that seems to be the popular past time this day and age. God
will seek revenge; you can count on it. Our young children don't have a
chance with leaders like you in charge. I would rather they grow up atheists
than fill their minds with
the garbage that you leaders are dishing out. Some example!
May God have mercy on your souls (???????) or
lack of (them)!
Betty Jane Voris
Napoleon,
Ind.
I fear that the situation is far more serious
than a matter of "disagreement" about which we will be in dialogue. It is
one thing to disagree. It is another matter for an annual conference to
disregard and to declare invalid those parts of the Discipline with which it
happens to "disagree." The problem is not with the Discipline or what it
says. Under our system as it is being interpreted by the Pacific Northwest
Conference, if a conference decides that it will not abide by the Discipline
in this matter (which several conferences have stated quite frankly, though
not officially), then there is really no way the Discipline can be amended
to make any difference. Trials are charades because there will never be a
conviction. The disobedient child rules the household. "Dialogue," though
always necessary, will not by itself change this situation. Thus, if the
church has a position, it has significance only in those conferences who
choose to understand that it has significance. There is no connection.
Riley B. Case
Kokomo, Ind.