|
Site
General Information about the Area Office North Indiana Conference Office South Indiana Conference Office
Prayer Guides Area United Methodist
Seashore District Volunteer Center VIM project -- Completed Hoosier United Methodist News Archives |
Close Up:
By Amy Green Privacy rights have become a growing concern among churches, especially since far-reaching federal regulations meant to protect patient privacy went into effect last April. The regulations, part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (known more commonly as HIPPA), have prompted clergy across the United States to rethink how they pray for parishioners. Some have scaled back or scrapped the prayer requests they share with congregations. Others find their care for hospitalized parishioners thwarted. They say they feel torn between their mission to minister to those in need and their obligation to be conscious of legal dangers. "We've missed some people. They've come and gone from the hospital again, and maybe sometime later they'll say, 'Didn't you know?'" said the Rev. Dennis Shock, pastor of First United Methodist Church in Crown Point, Ind., which draws about 400 on an average Sunday. "I feel a little frustrated and sometimes a little guilty." It is an unintended consequence of privacy laws and regulations such as HIPAA's. The law was approved in 1996 to address primarily health insurance issues. Its privacy regulations direct health plans and providers in how to share patient information, but the rules do not prohibit clergy from visiting patients or praying for them with congregations. However, the law does prohibit sharing patient information without consent when clergy are employed by hospitals as chaplains or churches that provide mental health services. The laws are so vast and new that many are interpreting them in different ways. For example, hospitals used to provide clergy with a list of patients sorted by denomination. Now some continue to provide the list with patient consent, but others have scrapped it altogether. HIPAA prompted enough confusion among churches that United Methodist attorneys posted a 12-page memorandum summarizing the law and its effects on the General Council on Finance and Administration's Web site in February. (Log on to www.gcfa.org, scroll down to "New at GCFA" and click on to HIPPA Memorandum for a PDF copy of this document.) The law is not aimed at pastors, and so many clergy concerns are unfounded, said Dan Gary, associate general counsel with the council in Evanston, Ill. But some are legitimate. Gary cited the case of a Presbyterian church-music director in Ohio who filed suit over information disclosed in a church bulletin that was posted on the Internet. The man had been hospitalized for months with depression. The case, filed before HIPAA's privacy regulations took effect, went to the state Court of Appeals, which ruled the man had grounds to sue. "That was an example of where less information might have mitigated the situation," Gary said. "There's really nothing wrong with getting consent for these kinds of disclosures even when you aren't legally required to do so. There's what the law allows you to do, and then there's the right thing to do." Shock now is more careful about the information he shares when reading prayer concerns during Sunday services. But he is more concerned about how HIPAA has affected his ability to minister to hospitalized parishioners. He used to get a call from the local hospital when a parishioner was admitted. Now he struggles for information even after a member is released on whether the patient was sent home or to another facility. "Rarely has this been an issue in my 30 years in ministry," he said. "Usually the problem is the other way - the parishioner will be in the hospital and no one knows and they get upset, or they get upset that we haven't put them on the prayer list." Last updated on May 17, 2004 |
|
Questions or comments: webmaster@inareaumc.org |